The Italian government has officially approved the construction of a massive suspension bridge that will connect the mainland to the island of Sicily.
This long-anticipated infrastructure project is set to become the longest single-span suspension bridge in the world, with a total length of around 3.7 kilometers and a central span of 3.3 kilometers.
The bridge will feature six road lanes (three in each direction) and two railway tracks, capable of handling up to 6,000 vehicles per hour and 200 trains per day. Twin steel towers rising nearly 400 meters will support the structure, anchored by four massive suspension cables made of over 44,000 wires.
Designed to last 200 years, the bridge will be built to withstand strong winds, heavy traffic, and significant seismic activity, as the Strait of Messina sits in one of Europe’s most earthquake-prone regions.
Economic and Strategic Significance
The project is expected to cost around €13.5 billion and aims to bring a major economic boost to southern Italy. It is projected to create over 100,000 jobs during its development and construction. The government also plans to classify the bridge as a dual-use structure, serving both civilian and defense purposes by improving the rapid movement of military personnel and equipment.
Preliminary work, including geological and archaeological surveys, is expected to begin in late 2025, with full construction scheduled to start in 2026. Completion is targeted for 2032–2033.
Challenges and Controversies
Despite its scale and ambition, the project has drawn criticism. Environmental groups have raised concerns about its impact on local wildlife and ecosystems, particularly migratory birds. Others have questioned the safety of such a large structure in a high-risk seismic area.
There are also fears about potential mafia involvement in contracts and procurement. In response, the government has pledged strict oversight, using anti-mafia protocols similar to those applied to other major national events and projects.
Public opinion is divided—while some see the bridge as a symbol of progress and unity, others argue the funds would be better spent on healthcare, education, and water infrastructure in underserved parts of the country.